PitBulls On the Web Banner
"Of all the creatures, man is the most detestable. Of the entire brood, he is the only one that possesses malice. He is the only creature that inflicts pain for sport, knowing it to be pain. The fact that man knows right from wrong proves his intellectual superiority to the other creatures; but the fact that he can do wrong proves his moral inferiority to any creature that cannot."--Mark Twain

THOUGHTS ON DOG FIGHTING

The American Pit Bull Terrier's story is mired in sad reality. Some fanciers, many who call themselves "dogmen", claim that in order to produce the real APBT, the dogs must be fought so they can prove their gameness (i.e. willingness to keep going despite pain and exhaustion). In their opinion, only the candidates that don't quit a fight are true representatives of the breed and should be bred - The others are called "curs" and eliminated.

Those people firmly believe that the abolishment of "Gametesting" would destroy the APBT breed. They therefore feel completely justified to continue exploiting dogs by forcing them into the worse possible form of abuse.

Are they right?

To put things in perspective, let me share my personal experience. I own several "Pet Bulls", all rescue dogs of unknown background. One or two of them "may" be game (I will never know since I don't "test" my dogs), but the rest would most likely qualify as curs since true game dogs are far in between. This mean that most of my dogs hopefully have enough survival instinct to value their life more than to "finish" a fight. Dogmen would call them "quitters", I call them "winners". However, since they are probably not game enough according to fanciers of that bloody sport, they are not worthy of their admiration. I can tell you that my dogs, game or not, are wonderful companions and I am very proud of them. Ironically, they would have received a bullet in the head in the yard of any dogman due to their lack or absence of gameness... None sense? I think so too.

In light of this, we need to ask ourselves; does the APBT breed really need to be saved? We do have the AST breed after all. American Staffordshire Terriers were APBTs until 1936. That year the AKC opened its stud books to a few APBTs that fit a standard they had chosen, and changed the name. The AST was born. A new breed, which was indeed nothing but a Pit Bull taken out of the pit. If we love the look and the temperament of the Pit Bull, we have it with the AmStaff. In my opinion, there is simply no need in this day and age, to continue producing dogs for and via the pit.

Many Pit Bull lovers are completely disgusted by the barbarian practice of dog fighting and don't hesitate to raise a strong voice against this terrible form of animal cruelty. Unfortunately some other people are being influenced by pro-fighting material they read in books and on the net, and decide to close their eyes. Some will even encourage this nonsense to continue by supporting the men and women who throw these dogs in the pit and watch them tear each other apart in order to test their gameness. Some Pit Bull owners push the paradox as far as disapproving dog fighting publicly, but will only buy dogs from gametested lines (i.e.: The breeding stock is fought before being allowed to reproduce). Hypocrisy at its best!

Those folks will even have the nerves to tell you they would never fight their own dog and can't bear the thought of their companion being hurt but for some illogical reasons they believe the suffering of the breeding dogs is justified. This may seem very hard to understand for those of us who would never let an animal get hurt in the name of some barbaric sport, but these people are victim of neutralization techniques from dog fighting advocates and don't have the intelligence to question any of it.

The most common argument used to validate this cruel sport is to claim that Pit Bulls love to fight.... Some of these dogs do fight, this is true, but why? Do they really like it? And if they do, does it really matter? Pit Bulls have been selectively bred to fight for more than a century. If they will not fight, they are eliminated from the gene pool. Is it right to breed a dog, kill the ones that don't fight, and then claim it's ok to fight them because the ones you haven't destroyed “like” to fight? Pit Bull dogs don't love to fight! They are genetically programmed for it!

There are other characteristics like good disposition, stability, superior physical attributes that are presented to provide justification for fighting these dogs. Even *IF* it was true, how important is it really? There are many great breeds of dogs that don't have to live a life of hell to make good pets. The fact is, there really is no justification for what this breed has to endure in the hands of dog fighters.

Pit fighting (call it gametesting if you want), is nothing but a barbaric blood sport invented to fulfill the sick need for violence of cowardly and insecure individuals. Pit Bulls don't have to be fought to be great dogs, and all of us who own wonderful game or not *Pet Bulls* have absolutely no doubt about this.

Those who don't agree with this need to ask themselves a question; Do you really need a game dog to boost your lack of confidence and poor self esteem? Wouldn't you take more pride in your own gameness and courage? I know the answer to that question. Hopefully you do too.

Veronique Chesser
Copyright 1997 edited 2003

Sitting on the fence? Please read the following exchange between an animal right activist and someone questioning the sport

Q: I've gained most of my knowledge and respect for this breed by reading books from pro-fighting authors. I can understand there pro-fight argument but in the back of my mind, I can't positively say matching these dogs is needed. So, I am asking you to "persuade" me. Give me the other side of the story that I don't hear from these dogmen. I recently just started looking through these PitBull websites and I'm astonished at the number of dogmen listed. I don't know whether their enthusiasm is in the breed or the "sport". If you've got the time, help me come to a conclusion. Thanks.

A: You state that you have seen many web sites on the Internet devoted to dogmen and their ideas on breeding and treatment of American Pit Bull Terriers. I too, have seen the web sites. You should be aware that no special understanding of morals, or understanding of proper relationships between animals and humans is required to launch a web site. The reality of the situation PitBull dogs face is much different from the picture dogmen paint of dogs "wanting" to fight. Another reality is that anyone with compassion for animals for one second would not try to justify what these scumbags do to the animals they raise.

First of all, these animals are born into the situation these dogmen create for them. They never know real companionship. They are EXPLOITED. These dogmen demand aggression from these animals, and it is the only trait which is acceptable, and the only trait which, after continued culling, is tolerated. What do you think really happens to a dog that does not meet those expectations? I can tell you that it is done away with, either just set free in some community, to become the responsibility of some rescue person, or worse, then it is picked up by some animal control officer to become the ward of some shelter with a "kill" policy regarding Pitbulls and PitBull mixes, or, they simply take it out back and shoot it, if they have no immediate need to make a "bait" dog out of it. I'm sure you know what a "bait" dog is, and the moral implications of that.

These people are, for the most part, just as cold and heartless toward humans as they are the dogs. Most are bigots, some are even felons with long rap sheets you can verify just by asking any law enforcement personnel to run their record. Moreover, it is the lack of human compassion that allows these cowards to feel that two dogs tearing themselves apart are competing is some "noble sport". Even if they were, these scumbags steal the glory the dogs exhibit, and wave it around as if it were their own. What kind of human could consider that an accomplishment? In reality, they use it to bolster their own useless ego.

I have been involved with PitBull rescue for only six months, and I have met several of these idiots. No thinking, compassionate individual would want to be associated with them. You need not ask that someone help you make a decision about the worth of this lifestyle choice. All you need to do is walk into a kill shelter and look into the faces of seized PitBull dogs who have no chance of being adopted because of the reputation dogmen give them, and the fear that the general public has of PitBull dogs, because of the utter mess these scumbags have made of the breed.

It is a shame so many of the dogs are put down, because I can take a dog away from one of them and in six months totally reeducate it and resocialize it so that the animal aggression these scumbags have tried so hard to instill in it can be controlled. I have done it, and I wish I had the time to do it more. But as long as people can look at these web sites and not see the big picture, I will see more dogs than I can ever help turned into cold slabs of flesh at some kill shelter, even if the poor animal makes it away from these idiots. Are you going to look at this evidence and not condemn these scumbags also? Are you going to ignore what is happening across the country with communities drawing up breed bans by the thousands? Are you going to participate in activities which make these dogs non-adoptable, even if they have responsible people willing to take them as family pets, and give them the attention they need?

How much attention do you believe a man with 30 dogs can give each dog? These dogs are PROPERTY, and only that to them. These dogs never get to experience the love that one man can give one dog. Dogs should not be TOYS for humans to exploit. They should not be bred for profit, and they certainly should not have to suffer the things these sub-humans force on them. These dogs should be helped, and be made safe, and be free from fear. What these dogmen call gameness is nothing more than "fight or flight" after being raised to know nothing else. Is that what you think an animal should be faced with as the purpose of his life? Sure some of them seem to excel at it. PitBull dogs want very much to please their owners. So they do their owners' bidding. But you need to try very hard to put yourself in the place of these dogs, and think about their treatment, and how you could make their lives better, and join the ranks who would call law enforcement in a second if they know of a planned dog fight, and be proud to have done it. Maybe if the idiots spend about 5 years in jail, they would begin to understand life in a cage, watching their back in fear every time another animal (and I use that term intentionally) is allowed near them, after all, that is the life they have given their dogs.

Q: What about "gameness"? To my understanding, I thought that was the only factor that made PitBulls so distinct from any other breeds, including AmStaffs. I thought gameness is THE factor that makes the PitBull unsurpassable in the pit (I'm not saying I condone fighting, merely stating the obvious). To my understanding, some authors speak of gameness not as mere aggression but as an unconquerable will, dogs with the heart of a lion. They include pit stories that state that its not the "barnstormers" that win but the dog that keeps coming back for more.

A: Pitbulls are not so distinct from any other breeds, they love, play, fear, hurt, and die just like any other. This myth of separation from other breeds in all aspects of their being, is part of the exploitation rhetoric these scumbags would have you believe. They are either responsible for, or benefit from these categorizations of their dogs natural instincts for survival. There are only two drives these dogs have when placed in a pit, that is "fight or flight". It is as simple as that. It is an age old reaction to confrontation that even humans share. It is a self preservation action not dependent on anything but a will to live. Sure, you can breed for physical traits, and along with that comes the increased ability to win a fight. But, the larger issue here is what would the dog do in the wild, without a circle of ignorant, poorly educated, bigoted, sub-humans enclosing, and entrapping them in confrontation, and reinforcing that with every aspect of the dogs life, including what they call gametesting. Every time the dog meets another dog it just another period of supported aggression by its owner.

Of all the animals on this planet, no other has so willingly left its former life behind for humans, to live with us and to protect us. The benefits are supposed to be MUTUAL, that is the only moral way to address it. Is allowing dogmen to get away with this stupidity the way we should treat former scavengers who approached our camp fires thousands of years ago only to end up protecting us and acting as a night watchmen for us? After thousands of years, they have been subjected to being molded into our own concepts of what we think they should be. They have deeded their lives to us, and we have exploited them in every way. Dog fighting is the worst of this exploitation.

Q: I know most law enforcement agencies import dogs from Germany due to the high quality strains (In contrast to the diluted gene pool of most AKC breeds in America), since they have bred Schuntzhund titled dogs since the early century. Does that mean that the only way to continue a high standard in pit bulls is to breed game dogs (which is thus tested in the pit)? Because the "serious" dogman states that he is just continuing the heritage of the breed... keeping the PitBull pure.

AmStaffs are not bred for gameness, and yet, they can be aggressive. So that blows the theory of gametesting to achieve benefit. But, you put too much store in gene pools and the like. Selective breeding can be a bad thing. Some mutts are better genetically than the most highly selected breeding program dogs. Man usually ruins nature when he decides to modify it. It is true with dogs also. Dogs that can't breathe well, dogs with bad backs, dogs with hip problems, dogs with heart problems..... look at the record of breed specific problems. They were all healthy wolves at one time!

Personally, I don't desire to own anything an ignorant, bigoted, scumbag, who would derive joy from seeing two animals tear themselves apart, has had before me, including dogs, but it is for the sake of a captive creature who cannot determine its own destiny that I work in rescue.

"Keeping the PitBull pure? Yes, purely dead, if not purely maimed, if not purely done away with by abandonment when they don't excel in the scumbags eyes, and then purely homeless, if not, purely captured, and purely PUT DOWN by a society that purely doesn't understand their aggressiveness.

Please throw out the pro-pit fighting books, better yet, keep them for fire starting this winter, and save some PitBull dog waiting right this minute in a shelter not far from you.

Rod Jones
castlecain@mindspring.com

 

An Entertainer Speaks Out

Bill Goldberg knows something about dogs. He used to play football for the University of Georgia Bulldogs. Now, he's a world-known wrestler. Yet one of his biggest passions involves rescuing dogs from what he calls the "insanity of dogfighting." Goldberg has testified before Congress asking for tougher animal abuse legislation. He told us he'd like to find dogfighters "one by one and take them into a ring against their will and show them how it really feels." He says entertainers like DMX are wrong to use dogfighting as a selling point for their music.

BRED TO DIE

 

 

"Completely lacking in conscience and feelings for others, psychopaths selfishly take what they want and do as they please, violating social norms and expectations without the slightest sense of guilt or regret." Robert D Hare, "Without Conscience"

INSANITY WITHOUT DELIRIUM


BACK